VCT (wax-required) tile vs. ESD (no-wax) tile: lifetime cost vs. which has greater anti static qualities

Our management is considering installing a standard VCT and using static dissipative wax vs. installating a no-wax, non-porous ESD tile like Ameriworx or Foundation series tile. I am trying to evaluate the cost differences between the 2 options as it's my opinion that the wax requires much more maintenance and poses a greater risk to the products we test. Can you advise me whether this is an accurate opinion?

The short answer is, yes, The maintenance cost associated with ESD wax quickly accummulates negating any money saved on the original VCT. Conversely, Staticworx Vinyl Tiles (Ameriworx and Foundation) are both economical and low-maintenance.

You may want to add a technical argument in addition to your concerns about maintenance. I assume you will be trying to meet ANSI/ESD standards. The recommendations for flooring in ANSI/ESD S20/20-2007 require a system resistance below 35 meg-ohms. System resistance is the aggregate resistance of the person, footwear, flooring and connection to ground. If ESD wax were used as the primary ESD flooring surface, it would mean that the wax would need to measure well below 35 meg-ohms (< 3.5 X 10E6 ) at all times. Manufacturers of ESD wax always specify the wax will measure as high as 1billion ohms – almost 2 orders of magnitude over the recommended limits for ANSI/ESD S202.0 system resistance.

These articles might prove useful in presenting your case:

Tags: 
Tags: 
Tags: 
Tags: 
Tags: 
Tags: 

Flooring that Keeps you Grounded DVDRequest Your Free ESD Flooring DVD

Get your copy of

"Flooring that Keeps You Grounded" DVD

with all the ESDTile.com videos featuring Dave Long.

Request a Free DVD Now!